Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable orchestration skill with a clear staged workflow and verified one-level reference bundle; the main gaps are implicit mid-stage validation checkpoints and minor verbosity.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation checkpoints inside the Capture/Patch stages (e.g. 'after each patch: re-run and confirm first divergence advanced before continuing') rather than relying on the end self-check.
Move the full js-reverse_* tool mapping table or the bootstrap table into a reference file, keeping only the most-used mappings inline to further trim tokens.
Tighten the '路由上下文' block to a compact routing list; the upstream/peer/downstream prose largely duplicates the '必读引用' and 适用范围 sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean imperative rules and tight stage descriptions that assume Claude's competence; minor verbosity in '适用范围' and '路由上下文' that could be trimmed without losing meaning. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete tool-name mappings (js-reverse_list_scripts, etc.) and an executable PowerShell bootstrap command give largely actionable guidance, with only minor gaps where guidance stays rule-based rather than copy-paste. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-stage Observe→Capture→Rebuild→Patch→DeepDive sequence with per-stage goals, a '必须产出' checkpoint for Observe, and an end completion self-check; validation checkpoints within later stages are implicit rather than explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Twelve one-level-deep reference files all exist and are listed in a dedicated '必读引用' section with routing context; navigation is clear, though some inline lists (tool mapping, bootstrap table) could arguably live in references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |