Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-routed protocol-reverse-engineering skill with a clear phased workflow and a properly structured one-level-deep reference. It is held back by an instruction-heavy body that defers executable decoding code to the reference and by implicit rather than explicit mid-workflow validation checkpoints for its risky replay operations.
Suggestions
Add at least one copy-paste-ready decoding example (e.g., the struct.unpack frame parser from the reference) inline in Phase 2 so the body is actionable without opening the reference.
Insert an explicit validation/feedback checkpoint in Phase 3 before replay (e.g., 'decode a harmless field first; if the layout does not parse, re-align on magic/length before retrying') to convert implicit checkboxes into a validate→fix→retry loop.
In Phase 4, gate the 'MUST 产出' artifacts behind an explicit verification step (re-run the decode command against a second sample to confirm reproducibility) before declaring the task complete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body uses lean checklist-style prompts ("□ 对齐多个同类消息", "□ 长度字段：大端/小端"), short concrete commands, and never explains concepts Claude already knows (no "what is Protobuf" padding). It matches anchor 3 (lean and efficient; every token earns its place) rather than anchor 2, which would require unnecessary explanation. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Quotes: "tshark -r cap.pcap -T fields -e frame.number -e ip.src -e tcp.payload", "protoc --decode_raw", and a tool table with bootstrap info. There is one concrete executable command plus specific tool guidance, but the body's instruction is mostly checklist prompts while the fully executable Python decoding skeleton is deferred to references/protocol-workflow.md, matching anchor 2 (some concrete guidance but incomplete / missing key details) rather than anchor 3's copy-paste-ready code. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Quotes: a clear 4-phase sequence ("Phase 1 — 采集与分诊" through "Phase 4 — 产物"), authorization gating ("auth 未 granted 禁止对目标 ACT"), and a final "任务完成自检" checklist. The sequence is clear with a final verification step, but mid-workflow validation is implicit checkboxes with no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loops for the risky replay operations ("重放：仅在授权 scope 内"), so per the destructive-operations cap it matches anchor 2 rather than anchor 3. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Quotes: "references/protocol-workflow.md — 帧布局与 Protobuf 速查". The body is an overview (routing, phases, toolchain) and the detailed cheat sheet lives one level deep in the verified-existing reference file, matching anchor 3 (clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references; content appropriately split). No nested 2+ level references are present. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |