Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A detailed, highly actionable workflow with concrete tool calls and verification steps; its main weakness is mild verbosity from restated holder geometry and prose that could be trimmed. No external bundle files exist, which is appropriate for this single-purpose skill.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the holder geometry (parentId/x/y/rotation/w/h) between step 3 and step 5 — define it once and reference it.
Tighten the output-image resolution section into a prioritized checklist rather than narrative prose.
Add an explicit validate-fix-retry loop for the destructive holder replacement (e.g., if the inserted image fails the visual inspection, regenerate rather than proceed).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient domain-specific detail, but the holder geometry (parentId/x/y/w/h) is restated across steps 3 and 5 and the output-image resolution prose could be tightened without losing the safety guidance. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete MCP tool names (get_cowart_selection, insert_cowart_image), explicit JSON/meta specs, asset-path patterns, and a copy-ready generation prompt example give fully actionable, parameter-level guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 8-step sequence with verification checkpoints (visual image inspection in step 4, final confirmation in step 8); lacks an explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop for the destructive holder replacement. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into Preconditions, Workflow, and Notes with no nested references, but the file is self-contained at ~135 lines with no content split into bundle files, so it sits just below the well-signaled-reference ideal. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |