Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, highly actionable requirements-discovery workflow with clear sequencing and concrete templates. Its weaknesses are redundancy (the PRD structure is repeated several times) and the lack of any file-splitting for a body well over 50 lines.
Suggestions
Move the reusable PRD, research-notes, and final-confirmation templates into reference files (e.g. references/prd-template.md) and link to them, leaving SKILL.md as a lean overview.
De-duplicate the PRD structure: define it once and reference that single source instead of restating Goal/Requirements/Acceptance Criteria/Out of Scope in three places.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely actionable templates rather than concept explanations Claude already knows, but the PRD structure is repeated across Step 0, 'PRD Target Structure (final)', and the final confirmation format, which could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready bash commands ('python3 ./.trellis/scripts/task.py create ...') and complete markdown templates for PRDs, research notes, expansion sweeps, and final confirmation. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0–8 are clearly sequenced with explicit gates (Gate A/B/C), a complexity classification table, question-priority ordering, and a final user-approval checkpoint in Step 8. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear sections, but the skill is a ~488-line monolithic SKILL.md with no bundle files; reusable templates (PRD, research, confirmation) that could live in reference files are inlined. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |