Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable workflow skill with explicit sequencing and validation checkpoints. Its only weakness is mild redundancy in the appendix tables, which slightly dents token efficiency.
Suggestions
Collapse the trailing 'Skills Reference' and 'Workflow Phases' tables or move them to a reference file, since they restate commands and phases already covered inline.
Trim the 'Why this workflow?' and 'Key Principle' callouts to one line each to reduce repetition of the code-spec-injection rationale.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with tables, bullet steps, and code blocks, but the trailing Skills Reference and Workflow Phases tables restate commands already shown inline and could be tightened; mild redundancy prevents the top anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash commands (e.g. 'python3 ./.trellis/scripts/task.py create', 'cat AGENTS.md'), a concrete PRD template, and a concrete research output format — copy-paste ready guidance throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are explicitly sequenced (Step 1–10 across Phases 1–3 with Path A/B), and validation checkpoints appear in Step 9 ('Review all code changes', 'Ensure lint and typecheck pass') with a fix-and-recheck feedback loop. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so scoring rests on organization: the body is split into clearly headed sections (Initialization, Task Classification, Task Workflow phases, Continuing Existing Task) with no nested reference chains. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |