Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable instruction body for a single-purpose navigation skill: concrete command templates, a complete worked example, and a clear step sequence. The main weakness is redundancy — the Key Principles section restates the trigger and workflow steps — and the absence of any error-recovery guidance.
Suggestions
Remove or drastically trim the 'Key Principles' section — its three bullets restate the opening sentence and Workflow steps 3–4, cutting roughly 25% of the body without losing information.
Add a brief recovery step to the workflow for when the target appliance is not visible in the current observation (e.g., 'If not found, go to another room / receptacle and re-scan').
Disambiguate the 'heat -> microwave/stoveburner' mapping by stating how to choose between the two (e.g., pick whichever is visible in the current observation).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean, but the entire 'Key Principles' section duplicates content already stated: 'Trigger' restates the opening sentence, 'Core Action' restates Workflow step 3, and 'Prerequisite Check' restates step 4. A duplicated section is more than the 'minor instances of over-explanation' of anchor 4, fitting anchor 3's 'could be tightened'. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: an explicit action-to-appliance mapping ('heat -> microwave/stoveburner, cool -> fridge, clean -> sinkbasin'), copy-paste-ready commands ('go to {appliance}', 'open {appliance}'), and a complete worked Thought/Action/Observation example covering the common heat case while the mapping determines the cool and clean cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four clearly sequenced steps with a prerequisite checkpoint ('check if the appliance requires preparation... perform open {appliance} before proceeding'), matching anchor 4. Not anchor 5 because there are no explicit validation or error-recovery steps (e.g., what to do if the target appliance is not found in the observation). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, self-contained with no external references needed, and well-organized into Workflow, Example, and Key Principles sections — meeting the rubric's simple-skill exception where progressive disclosure scores 5 with just well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |