Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is actionable and well-structured with a clear sequenced workflow and a concrete worked example, assuming Claude's competence throughout. The only weakness is mild redundancy in the Key Principles section, which restates earlier guidance.
Suggestions
Trim or merge the "## Key Principles" section into the workflow to avoid restating the trigger, core action, and prerequisite check already present above.
Consider noting in the example what happens after the appliance is open (the follow-on heat/cool/clean action) so the navigation-to-processing handoff is fully explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the "## Key Principles" section restates the trigger, core action, and prerequisite check already covered in the workflow and description, adding redundancy that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (`go to {appliance}`, `open {appliance}`), an explicit action-to-appliance mapping (heat->microwave/stoveburner, cool->fridge, clean->sinkbasin), and a worked example with real appliance IDs. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence with a conditional prerequisite checkpoint (prepare/open if needed), and the example demonstrates the observe-closed-then-open feedback loop; appropriate for a simple, non-destructive navigation task. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, organized into well-labeled sections (Workflow, Example, Key Principles), which meets the bar for simple skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |