Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured instruction skill with a clear numbered workflow, exact output format, and a worked example that leaves no ambiguity about what to do. The one real defect is that the bundled references/alfworld_actions_guide.md is orphaned — never referenced from the body — despite containing the action syntax and observation semantics the skill relies on.
Suggestions
Link the bundle reference from the body, e.g., under Execution Rules: 'For the full action set and observation semantics (e.g., \"Nothing happened.\" = invalid action), see [alfworld_actions_guide.md](references/alfworld_actions_guide.md)'.
Add a concrete rule for dual-category entities like `ottoman` (e.g., 'list dual-purpose entities under receptacles, since go to only accepts receptacle targets') to close the actionability gap.
Trim the 'Primary Objective' section, which restates the frontmatter description, and fold any needed framing into the workflow heading.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — it never explains what ALFWorld is or how agents work, and every section carries operational content (trigger, parse rules, category definitions, output format, worked example). Minor trimmable padding remains, e.g., the 'Primary Objective' section restates the frontmatter description ('systematically identify and catalog all objects and receptacles'), which fits the level-4 'minor instances of over-explanation' anchor rather than the fully lean level 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable: an exact output template ('Scan Complete. Receptacles: [list]. Objects: [list].'), a fully worked example with exact entity names, naming-convention details ('armchair 2', 'diningtable 1'), and the literal action 'go to sofa 1'. Per the rubric's instruction-skill note, absence of code is not penalized. It sits at level 4 rather than 5 because parsing edge cases are only gestured at ('Some entities (like `ottoman`) can be both depending on context') without concrete handling rules, a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is a clearly numbered sequence (Trigger → Parse & Extract → Categorize → Output Structured Mental Map) with unambiguous execution rules: exactly one 'go to' action, no looping, and explicit integration guidance for downstream planning. This is a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no destructive or batch operations, so the simple-skill exception applies and the unambiguous single action merits 5; the anti-drift check confirms level 4's 'minor validation gaps' language does not fit better since no validation is needed here. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is short and cleanly sectioned (Core Workflow, Execution Rules, Example from Trajectory) with nothing inlined that belongs in a separate file. However, the bundle's one reference file — references/alfworld_actions_guide.md, which contains the observation semantics ('On the {recep}, you see...', 'Nothing happened.') this skill depends on — is never linked or mentioned, so navigation to the bundle is a clear miss. That matches level 4 ('good structure... minor organization gaps') rather than 5, whose anchor requires well-signaled one-level-deep references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |