Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A clear, actionable single-task skill body with a good worked example and explicit branching. It is hurt by structural redundancy across sections and by an orphaned reference file that the body never points to.
Suggestions
Link references/action_primer.md from the body (e.g., under a References section) and defer the action-format and observation-pattern detail there instead of duplicating it inline.
Collapse the Core Workflow and Instructions sections into one sequenced section to remove the repeated navigate→open→scan→report narration.
Add a brief handling note for the invalid-action 'Nothing happened.' observation in the main workflow, not only in the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The Purpose section restates the description, and the Core Workflow and Instructions sections repeat the same navigate→open→scan→report sequence, while Key Principles restates rules already implied — clear tightening opportunities without losing meaning. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (`go to fridge 1`, `open fridge 1`) and a fully worked example, but the primary Instructions section relies on `<target_object>`/`<suspected_receptacle>` placeholders rather than concrete commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequence with explicit found/not-found branches and a retry-with-new-location feedback loop; not a destructive/batch operation so no validation cap applies, but invalid-action handling is absent from the body. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but a bundle file (references/action_primer.md) exists and is never referenced or linked from the body, while action/observation detail is duplicated inline rather than deferred to that reference. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |