Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured instruction body for a simple navigation skill with concrete action format and examples. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: supporting bundle files exist but are not surfaced or linked from the SKILL.md body.
Suggestions
Add a reference to references/action_primer.md (e.g., under Process or Notes) so the detailed action format rules and error-handling guidance are discoverable.
Make the validation step concrete — specify what 'validates the target location against the current environment observation' checks and what to do on failure.
Link references/trajectory_analysis.md as background for the navigation pattern, or note that the skill is self-contained and the references are supplementary.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (Input, Process, Notes) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives the executable action format 'go to {target}' with concrete examples ('toiletpaperhanger 1', 'toilet 1'), but the validation step is vague ('validates the target location against the current environment observation') without saying how. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear three-step sequence (validate, execute, return) plus an error-recovery note ('Nothing happened'... replan or verify), but the validation checkpoint is implicit rather than an explicit pass/fail gate. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized for a simple skill, but the provided bundle files (references/action_primer.md with action format rules and references/trajectory_analysis.md) are never referenced or linked from the body, leaving useful supporting material orphaned. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |