Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, actionable skill for a simple single-purpose task, with a real reference file and an explicit error-recovery loop. Consolidating the redundant Core Logic/Instructions/Error Handling sections and making the reference path more prominent would lift it further.
Suggestions
Merge 'Core Logic' and 'Instructions' into a single sequenced procedure to remove the duplicated go-to/verify and 'Nothing happened' content.
Replace the loose success-verification examples with one concrete check (e.g., assert the observation starts with 'You are at {target_receptacle}').
Surface `references/common_receptacles.md` in its own short 'References' section rather than only inside the error-handling step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but 'Core Logic', 'Instructions', and 'Error Handling' restate the 'Nothing happened' recovery and the go-to/verify flow, creating minor redundancy that could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives the concrete action format `go to {target_receptacle}` and a worked input→observation example, but success verification is described via loose examples ('You are at the {receptacle}' or 'observable list') rather than a precise check. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (parse → execute → verify) with an error feedback loop ('Nothing happened' → consult references → reformulate target) and an 'Already at Location' checkpoint; minor validation gaps keep it below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The receptacle list is appropriately split into a real one-level-deep file referenced as `references/common_receptacles.md`, but the reference is buried inside an error-handling step rather than surfaced in a dedicated navigation section. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |