Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, actionable, and has a clear decision workflow with an error-recovery step. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: it defers detail to a reference that is vaguely signaled and essentially empty.
Suggestions
Replace "see the reference documentation" with an explicit link to the real file, e.g. "See [state diagrams & edge cases](references/state_diagrams.md)".
Populate references/state_diagrams.md with the actual state diagrams and edge cases it promises, or remove the reference and inline the needed detail if the file will stay empty.
The trajectory example partly restates the Core Decision Logic; consider trimming it to only the steps that add new information.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~30-line body is lean and well-targeted to the alfworld receptacle actions, with no padding explaining concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives the exact executable command format ("Action: open {recep}" / "Action: close {recep}") and concrete copy-paste-ready examples ("Action: open fridge 1", "Action: close fridge 1", "Action: open microwave 1"). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Core Decision Logic is a clearly sequenced state-check → choose-action → execute flow, and the Important Notes add an explicit error-recovery checkpoint (re-check on "Nothing happened"), which fits a simple skill scoring 3. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned, but the deferred detail ("see the reference documentation") is not clearly signaled with a path/link, and the referenced bundle file references/state_diagrams.md is only an empty stub with no actual state-diagram or edge-case content — so the reference is weak rather than a clean one-level pointer. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |