Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is excellent on conciseness, actionability, and workflow clarity, with executable commands and a clear validated workflow. The main gap is progressive disclosure: two bundle reference files are present but never linked from the body, while their content is inlined.
Suggestions
Replace the inlined interaction table with a pointer to references/action_reference.md (e.g., "See [action_reference.md](references/action_reference.md) for the full command matrix") and keep only a brief inline summary.
Move or cross-link the worked trajectory to references/trajectory_example.md so the body stays a concise overview and the bundle file is actually reachable.
Add a short 'References' section at the bottom of the body listing each bundle file with a one-line description so navigation is explicitly signaled.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient — a compact command-syntax table, short error-handling bullets, and one minimal trajectory example — with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the score-5 anchor; it does not drift down to 4 because there are no meaningful instances of over-explanation to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (`clean {obj} with {tool}`, `take {object} from {receptacle}`) and a complete worked trajectory covering the common case, matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Presents a clear four-step sequence (Identify Requirements → Locate and Acquire → Execute Interaction → Verify Outcome) with an explicit validation checkpoint ("Check the environment observation"; "Nothing happened" means invalid) and error-recovery feedback loops, matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned for a simple skill, but bundle files exist (references/action_reference.md, references/trajectory_example.md) that are never referenced or linked from the body while overlapping content is inlined (the action table and example trajectory), matching the score-3 anchor ("references present but not clearly signaled; content that should be separate is inline"); not a 4 because the duplicate inlined content has a natural home in the bundle files, and not a 2 because the in-body structure is genuinely organized. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |