Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers highly actionable, well-sequenced instructions with exact commands, an explicit validation step, and error handling, at good token efficiency. The main weakness is the orphaned, empty references/circuit_schematic.md file that the body never points to, which leaves the bundle structure disconnected from the SKILL.md overview.
Suggestions
Either link references/circuit_schematic.md from the body (e.g., under Key Principles: 'See [circuit_schematic.md](references/circuit_schematic.md) for the schematic') or remove it — it is currently an empty stub that the body never references.
Trim the duplication between Section 3 (Core Procedure) and Section 6 (Example) — e.g., keep the parameterized templates and show only the final worked sequence, or fold the concrete example values into the templates.
Make the observation step unambiguous by specifying the exact iteration count or command form for 'wait1' rather than '1-2 iterations'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence (no explanation of what circuits or conductivity are), but the 10-step Example section duplicates the parameterized Core Procedure almost line-for-line. Efficient with minor duplication that could be trimmed, matching anchor 4 rather than 5; well above anchor 3 since there is no unnecessary concept explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides exact executable commands with placeholders ('connect battery anode to <Wire1> terminal 1'), concrete substitute examples ('e.g., orange wire'), and a fully worked copy-paste-ready example covering the common case. Matches the anchor-5 example of fully executable, specific guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced workflow: prerequisites, numbered build steps, explicit validation checkpoint ('wait1', 'look around', check whether the light bulb is on), conditional final action based on the result, and error recovery guidance ('If a component is missing, examine the room'). Matches anchor 5's explicit validation and feedback-loop pattern; the operation is not destructive or batch, so no cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized with clear sections and is roughly the right size, but the bundle's only reference file (references/circuit_schematic.md) is never mentioned or linked anywhere in the body and itself contains only empty headings. References are present in the bundle but entirely un-signaled, matching anchor 3 rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |