Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with a clear sequenced procedure, concrete scienceworld action patterns, and a verification step. Its main defects are references to bundled scripts (setup_heater.py, monitor_temperature.py) that do not exist in the bundle.
Suggestions
Add the missing scripts (setup_heater.py, monitor_temperature.py) to a scripts/ directory, or remove the references and inline the concrete action steps they would perform.
Add a feedback loop after the Verify Setup step (e.g., what to do if the device is not 'turned on' or the container is not listed on it) to lift workflow clarity.
Tighten the Purpose section, which restates the frontmatter description, to improve token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concrete action patterns and no padding of concepts Claude already knows; the Purpose section lightly restates the description and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable action patterns ('move <SUBSTANCE> to <CONTAINER>', 'activate <HEATING_DEVICE>', 'look at <HEATING_DEVICE>') cover the common cases, but the referenced bundled scripts do not exist in the bundle, leaving a gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence with an explicit verification checkpoint (step 4, expected observation) is present; it lacks a feedback loop for what to do if verification fails, so it stops short of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is good and references/thermal_procedures.md exists, but the body directs Claude to bundled setup_heater.py and monitor_temperature.py which are absent from the bundle, creating broken navigation. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |