Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, actionable skill body with a clear sequenced procedure and concrete commands, weakened mainly by orphaned bundle files: both reference files exist but are never linked, so their content (including the exact teleport syntax) is duplicated or lost. Conciseness and workflow clarity are otherwise good.
Suggestions
Add explicit one-level-deep references to the existing bundle files, e.g., under 'Prioritize Rooms': 'Full room ranking: See [room_priority.md](references/room_priority.md)' and in 'Core Procedure': 'Action syntax: See [action_glossary.md](references/action_glossary.md)'.
Replace the inline room-priority tier list with a short top-3 summary plus the reference link, removing the duplication with room_priority.md.
State the exact teleport command syntax (from action_glossary.md, e.g., `teleport to LOC`) inline in step 2 so the core navigation step is executable from the body alone.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — no concept explanations, just commands and decision rules ('Use `look around` upon arrival', '`activate` the source if necessary'). Not 5 because the 'Quick Reference' section restates the trigger/loop/success already covered, and the room-priority tiers duplicate references/room_priority.md. Clearly above anchor 3, which requires unnecessary explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance with concrete backticked commands (`look around`, `examine`, `pick up`, `move`, `activate`, `deactivate`) and concrete sub-steps (a-e for fixed sources). Not 5 because the core navigation command is only described as 'Teleport to and survey rooms' — the actual `teleport to LOC` syntax lives solely in the unreferenced action_glossary.md. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with conditional branches ('If a source is found... proceed', 'If not, find one') and an explicit termination check ('Once the required liquid is successfully obtained and in your inventory, conclude'). Not 5 because feedback loops are missing — e.g., no guidance for re-checking when a found source yields nothing — though this is a simple search skill, not a destructive/batch operation, so no cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but the bundle contains references/action_glossary.md and references/room_priority.md and the body never references either — the room-priority tiers and action semantics are inlined instead of delegated, leaving the reference files undiscoverable. This is worse than anchor 4's 'references mostly clear' but better than anchor 2, since the body itself is well-structured rather than a monolith. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |