CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

scienceworld-measurement-taker

Use when the agent needs to measure a quantitative property (temperature, weight, pH) of a target object or substance using a measurement tool. This skill covers acquiring the tool, preparing both tool and target with focus actions, executing the measurement via "use [TOOL] on [TARGET]", and interpreting the resulting value for conditional decisions such as classification or placement.

67

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable skill body with concrete commands and worked examples. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: two reference files exist but are never referenced or linked from SKILL.md.

Suggestions

Add a short 'References' section linking to references/action_glossary.md (action definitions) and references/decision_workflow.md (verification checklist and error recovery) so the overview points one level deep to the detailed material.

Trim or fold the 'Key Principles' section into the workflow steps to remove restatement and tighten conciseness.

Surface the State Verification Checklist and error-recovery notes from decision_workflow.md inline (or via a clear link) so the workflow has an explicit feedback loop, raising workflow_clarity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is largely lean and assumes competence, but the 'Key Principles' section restates workflow steps (e.g., 'Focus before use', 'Tool first'), adding minor over-explanation that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (`pick up`, `focus on [TOOL] in inventory`, `teleport to`, `use [TOOL] on [TARGET]`) and concrete worked examples with real values, covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 7-step sequence is clear with explicit validation checkpoints via 'focus on ... to confirm readiness' (steps 2 and 4), but the body lacks an explicit error-recovery feedback loop (that material lives only in the reference), so it does not reach the checklist/feedback-loop anchor 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized, but the body never links to the existing bundle files (references/action_glossary.md, references/decision_workflow.md); references are present in the bundle yet not signaled from the overview, matching the 'references present but not clearly signaled' anchor 3.

3 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that clearly states both capability and trigger conditions with concrete, domain-specific actions. It is specific and complete, with only minor room for synonym/trigger-term expansion.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('acquiring the tool, preparing both tool and target with focus actions, executing the measurement via "use [TOOL] on [TARGET]", and interpreting the resulting value for conditional decisions'), but 'preparing... with focus actions' abstracts the exact action, leaving minor gaps versus the comprehensive anchor 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (acquire tool, prepare, execute, interpret) and 'when' via a concrete 'Use when the agent needs to measure a quantitative property...' trigger clause, matching the anchor that requires both with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms users would say ('measure', 'temperature, weight, pH', 'measurement tool') with good coverage of property types, but lacks common synonyms or variants that would push it to the comprehensive anchor 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Has a clear niche (quantitative measurement with tools) and distinct triggers, with only minor overlap risk against other ScienceWorld skills, so it sits above the broad anchor 3 but not at the minimal-conflict anchor 5.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
zjunlp/SkillNet
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.