Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, actionable, well-sequenced body for a simple single-action skill, with copy-paste-ready commands and a confirmation checkpoint. The main weakness is progressive disclosure: a useful reference file exists but is not linked from the body, leaving richer patterns and anti-patterns undiscoverable.
Suggestions
Add a brief "See also" or "More examples" line linking to references/usage_examples.md so the additional patterns (re-focusing, implicit focus, anti-patterns like wrong object names) are discoverable from the body.
Add a short feedback-loop note for the failure case where focus fails or the object name is wrong (e.g., re-examine and retry with the exact observation noun phrase) to raise workflow clarity.
Trim the redundancy between the Core Instruction steps and the worked Example, or reframe the Example as a distinct second scenario to avoid restating the same three steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, with each section earning its place; held at 4 rather than 5 because the worked Example restates the Core Instruction steps and "When to Use" overlaps with the description, giving minor trimmable redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides the exact executable command form `focus on <OBJECT_NAME>` with concrete object-name examples (`dove egg`, `copper wire`, `beaker`) and a full worked action sequence (`look around` -> `focus on dove egg` -> `pick up dove egg`), which is copy-paste ready within the ScienceWorld action space and covers common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Core Instruction gives a clear 3-step sequence (Identify Target -> Execute Focus -> Proceed) with a confirmation checkpoint ("After receiving a confirmation observation, continue"); not 5 because there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop for failure modes like an incorrect object name or a failed focus, which the reference file actually documents. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized into clear sections (Purpose, When to Use, Core Instruction, Key Considerations, Example), but the existing bundle file references/usage_examples.md — which contains valuable extra examples, common patterns, and anti-patterns — is never linked or signaled from the body, so the reference is present but not clearly surfaced. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |