Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence with no basic-concept padding, but the same three commands (`pick up OBJ`, `move OBJ to OBJ`, `look at`) appear in both the Core Workflow and the Key Actions table, and then again in the Example — trimmable duplication. Not 5 because that repetition could be consolidated; not 3 because the excess is minor and localized.

Actionability

Commands are exact and executable in the target environment (`pick up metal pot`, `move metal pot to blue box`, `look at <CONTAINER>`), and the worked example includes the expected confirmation output ("In the blue box is: a metal pot"), making it copy-paste ready for the common case. Nothing is pseudocode or left abstract.

Workflow Clarity

The four-step sequence is clear and includes an explicit validation checkpoint ("Verify Placement: `look at <CONTAINER>`" reinforced by "Always verify placement with `look at` — do not assume success"). It is not 5 because there is no error-recovery feedback loop — no guidance on what to do if the move fails or the object is absent from the container after verification.

Progressive Disclosure

The body itself is well-organized with clear sections and is under 50 lines, but the bundle contains `references/action_primer.md` which is never referenced or signaled anywhere in the body — an orphaned reference with no navigation path. Per the bundle-structure guideline this matches anchor 3 ("references present but not clearly signaled"); not 2 because the body structure is good and content is not inlined that belongs elsewhere.

Specificity

The description names the domain and one concrete action — "Moves a specified object from the environment or inventory into a target container based on a classification decision" — with concrete mechanics (source, destination, condition). It stays at 3 because it lists only a single action verb rather than several specific actions, and not 2 because the action described is concrete rather than generic.

Completeness

It explicitly answers both questions: the what ("Moves a specified object from the environment or inventory into a target container based on a classification decision") and the when ("Use this skill when a task requires sorting or storing an object in a specific location after an assessment"), with concrete trigger examples (conductive → blue box, non-conductive → orange box). This matches the anchor-5 example structure exactly.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrases are present: "sorting or storing an object in a specific location", "placing a conductive object in the blue box", and "after an assessment". It falls short of 5 because common synonyms like "put" or generic "container" phrasing are missing, and above 3 because multiple natural trigger phrases (not just keywords) are covered.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The classification-conditioned placement niche is mostly distinct — the trigger is tied to acting "after an assessment" with specific container outcomes. It is not 5 because the description never names the target environment and the generic "storing an object in a specific location" phrasing creates minor overlap risk with general sorting/storage skills.