Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured, single-purpose skill with concrete actions and a clear sequence, though it lacks a worked example command and any post-planting verification. Its main weakness is that the existing reference file (action_primer.md) is orphaned — never signaled from the body — leaving useful detail undiscoverable.
Suggestions
Link references/action_primer.md from the body (e.g., a 'See [action_primer.md](references/action_primer.md) for the full ambiguity protocol and example commands' note under Core Procedure) so the bundled reference is discoverable.
Include one concrete example command in the body, such as `move avocado seed in seed jar to flower pot 1`, to make the transfer step copy-paste ready.
Consolidate the Purpose and When to Use sections, which currently restate the frontmatter description, and add a brief verification step (confirm the seed is in the container) before the `focus on` signal.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — no basic-concept explanations, no padding — but there is minor redundancy: the Purpose section ("orchestrates the initial planting action to begin a plant growth process") restates the frontmatter description, and "This resolves the ambiguity deterministically" could be trimmed. This sits between anchor 5's every-token-earns-its-place and anchor 3's noticeable slack. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete for an instruction-only skill: "Perform a `move` action to transfer the seed from your inventory to the target container", "must contain both `soil` and `water` substances", "select the first option (index `0`)", "use `focus on [seed]`". It falls short of anchor 5 because no complete example command string (e.g., a concrete `move ... to ...` invocation) appears in the body — the only worked example lives in the unreferenced action primer. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step Core Procedure is clearly sequenced with an explicit suitability criterion in step 1 and an error-recovery path (ambiguity resolution) in step 3, matching anchor 4. It misses anchor 5 because there is no post-transfer verification that the seed actually landed in the container before signaling intent with `focus on`. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The bundle contains `references/action_primer.md` with the full ambiguity protocol, a concrete example command, and a suitability-check example — but the body never references or links to it, so the file is undiscoverable from the skill and its fuller detail is only summarized inline. This matches anchor 3 ("references present but not clearly signaled") rather than the well-signaled references of anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |