scienceworld-process-monitor

This skill observes the state of an active apparatus and its contents to track progress. Use when you need to periodically check for state changes (e.g., solid to liquid) during a heating or reaction process. The skill uses 'look at' or 'examine' actions on the apparatus and substance.

Quality

87%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, actionable, well-sequenced monitoring protocol with concrete commands and a clear feedback loop. The single weakness is that the provided reference file is orphaned — never linked from the body — so progressive disclosure is underexploited.

Suggestions

Add a one-line pointer to the reference in the Procedure or a References section, e.g. "For common state-transition strings, see [state_transitions.md](references/state_transitions.md)."

Have step 2 (examine) explicitly mention consulting state_transitions.md when the observed adjective/noun change is ambiguous.

Consider moving the worked example into the reference file if you want the SKILL.md body even leaner, or keep it inline and only link the transition table.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, with no padding or explanation of known concepts; even the closing boundary note ("This skill only observes — it does not modify") earns its place, matching anchor 5.	5 / 5
Actionability	It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (`look at <APPARATUS>`, `examine <SUBSTANCE>`, `activate`, `wait`) plus a worked example with real observation strings, matching anchor 5.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear numbered procedure with explicit decision branches (activate if inactive, wait-and-repeat if no change) and a feedback loop; the operation is read-only/non-destructive so no destructive-validation cap applies, matching anchor 5.	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The body is well-sectioned, but a bundle file (references/state_transitions.md) exists and is never referenced or linked from the body, so its value is not surfaced; per the bundle-structure guideline this is a reference present but not clearly signaled, matching anchor 3.	3 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Description

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, well-formed description that clearly states both capability and trigger conditions for a narrow domain. The main gap is specificity of actions, which stays at the 1-2 concrete action level rather than a fuller enumeration.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain and 1-2 concrete actions ("observes the state", "'look at' or 'examine' actions") but does not enumerate several specific actions, matching anchor 3 and falling short of the broader coverage of anchor 4.	3 / 5
Completeness	It explicitly answers both "what" ("observes the state of an active apparatus and its contents to track progress") and "when" ("Use when you need to periodically check for state changes... during a heating or reaction process") with concrete trigger phrases, matching anchor 5.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Natural trigger phrases like "check for state changes" and "heating or reaction process" give good keyword coverage, though a few synonymous phrasings users might say are missing, fitting anchor 4 rather than the comprehensive anchor 5.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	It occupies a clear niche (ScienceWorld apparatus/process monitoring) with distinct triggers ("active apparatus", "state change", "heating or reaction") and minimal overlap risk with other skills, matching anchor 5.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: zjunlp/SkillNet
Path: experiments/src/skills/scienceworld/scienceworld-process-monitor/SKILL.md
Commit: 076c6df

Reviewed: 6 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.