Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, actionable, and presents a clear monitored workflow with a feedback loop. Its main gap is that the bundled reference file is not surfaced from the overview, weakening progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Add a one-line link to the bundled reference, e.g. under Procedure: 'See [state transitions](references/state_transitions.md) for common observable state changes.'
Reference the state-transition table when interpreting examine output (step 3) so the reference is integrated into the workflow rather than orphaned.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~25-line body is lean with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (procedure, example, scope note) earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete executable game actions ('look at <APPARATUS>', 'examine <SUBSTANCE>', 'activate <APPARATUS>', 'wait') and an example with real observed outputs, not pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence with conditional branches and a feedback loop (step 4: 'If no change, use wait then repeat from step 1') plus a state-comparison checkpoint; the read-only monitoring task is non-destructive so no destructive-ops cap applies. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well organized into sections, but references/state_transitions.md exists yet is never linked or signaled from SKILL.md, leaving a one-level-deep reference without clear navigation. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |