Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, highly actionable single-purpose skill with an explicit verify step and a concrete worked example. Its weaknesses are the missing error-recovery loop and, most importantly, the orphaned references/phase_change_protocol.md bundle file that the body never points to, hiding genuinely useful error-handling and workflow content.
Suggestions
Add a clearly signaled reference to the existing bundle file, e.g., a 'Full workflow and error handling: See [phase_change_protocol.md](references/phase_change_protocol.md)' line, so the appliance guidance and failure recovery content is discoverable.
Include a brief recovery step in Core Instruction (e.g., 'If the move fails with "You can't do that", run `open <APPLIANCE>` and retry') to close the validation feedback loop around step 3's verification.
Trim the redundancy between Purpose, When to Use, and the Inputs/Output bullets in Important Notes, which restate the same information three times.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and command-focused with no concept explanations Claude wouldn't know, but the 'Important Notes' section repeats the inputs/outputs already covered by the description and the Purpose/When to Use sections restate each other — minor over-explanation that could be trimmed, fitting anchor 4 rather than the fully lean anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable for the target environment: exact commands (`move <SUBSTANCE_CONTAINER> to <APPLIANCE>`, `look around`, `look at <APPLIANCE>`) with defined placeholders and a complete worked example (`move glass cup (containing a substance called mercury) to freezer`) covering the common case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-step sequence (locate, execute, verify) is clear and unambiguous with an explicit verification checkpoint (`look at <APPLIANCE>`), but there is no recovery path if verification or the move fails — the 'door must be open' prerequisite is noted without a fix step, and the error-handling feedback loop exists only in the unreferenced bundle file, matching anchor 4's 'minor validation gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The under-50-line body is well organized into clean sections, but the bundle's references/phase_change_protocol.md — which contains the full workflow, appliance guidance, and error handling that would directly extend this skill — is never mentioned or linked anywhere in the body, leaving an existing reference unsignaled and undiscoverable, which matches anchor 3's 'references present but not clearly signaled'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |