Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, highly actionable, and presents a clear workflow with validation and error recovery. The only notable gap is progressive disclosure: the bundled reference is weakly signaled and slightly duplicated inline.
Suggestions
Replace the prose mention ('consult the bundled reference for common container names') with an explicit link such as 'See [common_containers.md](references/common_containers.md) for the full container list'.
Trim the inlined container priority list in 'Scan Environment for Containers' so it points to the reference instead of duplicating its contents, reducing token overlap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, well-organized body with no padding about concepts Claude already knows; the only trimmable redundancy is the worked Example re-walking the Core Procedure steps. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance with concrete commands (`move [SUBSTANCE] to [CONTAINER]`, `examine`, `look around`), a clear container priority order, and a copy-paste-style worked example including expected output ('metal pot (containing chocolate)'). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear five-step sequence with an explicit Verify checkpoint and a feedback loop for error recovery ('If the transfer fails... look around again and consult the bundled reference'), matching the validate-then-proceed pattern. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured ~40-line body with a real one-level-deep reference (common_containers.md), but the reference is signaled in prose ('consult the bundled reference') rather than a clear link, and the inlined container priority list partly duplicates the reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |