Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, highly actionable skill body with concrete commands and a worked example. Workflow sequencing is clear but light on validation/retry guidance, and the existing reference file is not surfaced from the body.
Suggestions
Add an explicit error-recovery step in the Core Workflow (e.g., if `use TOOL on TARGET` fails or returns no change, re-run `look around` to verify the target name and retry).
Link the example trajectory from the body (e.g., under the Example section: 'See [example_trajectory.md](references/example_trajectory.md) for a full end-to-end trace') so the reference is clearly signaled.
Note prerequisite validation explicitly (confirm tool is in inventory via `look around` / inventory check before executing `use`) to strengthen the workflow checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean ~35-line body that assumes Claude's competence, avoids explaining what tools are, and lets every line earn its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (`pick up OBJ`, `use TOOL on TARGET`, `look around`) plus a complete worked example with exact inputs and the observation output, covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence (ensure tool, identify target, execute, interpret) with a light confirm step, but lacks explicit error-recovery or retry checkpoints for failed interactions. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections for a simple single-purpose skill, with a one-level-deep reference (references/example_trajectory.md), but that reference is not linked or signaled from the body. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |