Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, highly actionable with concrete commands, and well-structured with a genuine reference file. The only gap is that workflow validation is implicit rather than an explicit checkpoint, though the simple non-destructive nature of the task limits that risk.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, well-sectioned, and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, with only minor phrases ('foundational step for planting tasks') that could be trimmed, fitting the 'efficient; minor over-explanation' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives fully executable, copy-ready commands ('use shovel in inventory on ground', 'pick up soil', 'teleport to outside') covering the common cases, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Core Procedure is a clear numbered sequence (navigate, dig, collect) with an error-handling section and a verify step, but validation is implicit rather than an explicit checkpoint, so it sits below the explicit-feedback-loop anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a short, simple, single-purpose skill with well-organized sections and a real one-level-deep reference (trajectory_excerpt.md) that is clearly signaled, qualifying for the top anchor under the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |