Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, actionable, and well-sequenced with a verification step and ambiguity handling. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: two reference files exist but are not linked from SKILL.md, leaving them orphaned.
Suggestions
Link the existing bundle files from the body (e.g., 'See [action_primer.md](references/action_primer.md) for action semantics') so they are discoverable and one level deep.
Move the detailed ambiguity-handling rationale into the primer reference and keep only the rule in SKILL.md to tighten the overview.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint phrasing (e.g., 'Only proceed to focus once the object is confirmed visible') to lift workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~15 lines) with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; only minor redundancy between the 'When to Use' line and the frontmatter keeps it from a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete commands (`look around`, `focus on <OBJECT>`, responding with option `0`) and a worked banana example, but the example is task-specific rather than fully copy-paste ready for arbitrary objects. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 3-step sequence with a verification step (`look around` to confirm visibility) and an ambiguity feedback loop; the verification gate is implicit rather than an explicit validation checkpoint, so it falls short of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Bundle files exist (references/action_primer.md, references/trajectory_analysis.md) but are never referenced or linked from the body, so supplementary material is orphaned and inlined content that could point to them is not signaled. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |