Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured instruction-only skill whose main weaknesses are an empty example section, an orphaned reference file, and missing validation/price-comparison detail in the core workflow.
Suggestions
Fill in the empty 'Example from Trajectory' section with a concrete observation → selected option → click[value] action trace so the selection logic is unambiguous.
Link references/strategy_docs.md from the body (e.g., a '## Selection strategies' pointer) and reconcile the 'lowest final price' instruction with the first-listed-value heuristic the doc actually implements.
Add a verification step after the click (e.g., confirm the displayed price/selected state updated and still satisfies the user's budget constraint) before proceeding to buy now.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean ~20-line body that assumes Claude's competence, adds only non-obvious domain specifics, and contains no padded explanations of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete action format ('click[value]') and a clear selection strategy, but the core 'select the value that results in the lowest final price' mechanism is unspecified, contradicts the bundled strategy doc (which uses a first-listed-value heuristic), and the 'Example from Trajectory' section is empty. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence (parse → apply strategy → execute click) is present, but there is no validation checkpoint confirming the option was actually selected or the price updated as expected. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is reasonable, but the bundled references/strategy_docs.md is never referenced or linked from the body (orphaned), and the 'Example from Trajectory' section is left empty. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |