Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, actionable, and well-sequenced for a simple single-purpose skill. Its one weakness is progressive disclosure: a reference file exists but is not linked from the body, and an example section is left empty.
Suggestions
Add an explicit, clearly signaled link to the reference (e.g., 'See [strategy_docs.md](references/strategy_docs.md) for detailed selection strategies and edge cases').
Either fill in the 'Example from Trajectory' section with a concrete observation/action pair or remove the empty stub heading to avoid a dangling reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place, though the empty 'Example from Trajectory' header is a minor inefficiency not severe enough to drop the score. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance with the specific action format 'click[value]', ordered category selection, and explicit tie-breaking ('select the first available option'), making it copy-paste ready rather than abstract. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence (Parse -> Apply Strategy -> Execute) with explicit precedence and fallback rules in Important Notes; the operation is not destructive/batch so missing feedback loops does not cap the score. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized for a simple skill, but the existing reference strategy_docs.md is never explicitly linked from the body and the 'Example from Trajectory' section is an empty stub, leaving references incompletely signaled. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |