Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A clear, actionable skill body with a well-sequenced verification workflow and concrete examples. The main gap is the orphaned action_guidelines.md reference file that the body never points to.
Suggestions
Link references/action_guidelines.md from the body (e.g., in a Notes or Actions section) and trim the inlined action-format detail to avoid duplication, or remove the unused reference file.
Tighten the Core Objective section so it does not restate the Trigger, and prune Notes entries that repeat points already made in the Execution Workflow.
Consider adding a short re-check loop note for the NOT-SUITABLE branch (e.g., re-confirm which constraint failed before issuing 'click[back to search]') to strengthen workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient and mostly lean with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; minor redundancy where the Core Objective restates the Trigger and the Notes section repeats earlier points, keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance with exact action strings ('click[buy now]', 'click[back to search]'), a concrete Output Format template, and two complete worked examples covering both the proceed and reject cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (Parse -> Scrape -> Constraint Verification -> Decision) with an explicit suitability check that gates the proceed/reject decision; not a 5 because there is no error-recovery feedback loop, though none is strictly required for a decision skill. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections and an appropriately sized SKILL.md, but references/action_guidelines.md exists and is never linked from the body (its action-format details are inlined), leaving a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |