Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured and lean with a clear decision workflow, but it is undermined by a missing output-format specification and by bundle reference files that are present but never linked from the body, leaving navigation incomplete.
Suggestions
Complete the 'Output Format' section by showing the exact required response format (e.g., `click[<value>]` or `search[<keywords>]`), since the section currently ends with 'in this exact format:' and nothing follows.
Link the bundle files from the body — e.g., add a 'See [action_guidelines.md](references/action_guidelines.md) for valid action patterns and exact-match rules' note near the Core Logic, and reference trajectory_example.md as a worked example.
Make the validation checkpoints explicit (e.g., 'Verify the option string is an exact, case-sensitive match for a clickable element before emitting click[]') rather than leaving them implicit in the Examine step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence — it does not explain what a webshop or product page is — with only minor redundancy in repeated '10 slots' examples that could be trimmed, fitting the 'efficient with minor over-explanation' anchor rather than the fully lean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The Core Logic gives concrete if/then branches with real action examples (click '10 slots', 'Back to Search', 'Buy Now'), but the 'Output Format' section promises 'Your response must be in this exact format:' and then provides nothing — a missing key detail that leaves the guidance incomplete, matching the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (Parse → Examine → Decision & Action) with implicit validation checkpoints (price-vs-budget check, required-attribute check) and a fallback branch (Back to Search), but the checkpoints are implicit rather than explicit error-recovery loops, so it sits at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is organized into clear sections (Purpose, Input, Core Logic, Output Format) but never signals or links the provided bundle files (references/action_guidelines.md, references/trajectory_example.md), and the crucial exact-action-syntax rules live only in an unreferenced file — matching 'some structure but references not clearly signaled'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |