CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

webshop-product-detail-inspector

This skill examines a product detail page to verify specific attributes or select options like size, color, or quantity. It is used after clicking on a product, to confirm that the item matches the user's needs (e.g., checking for '10 slots' option, price, material). The input is the product page observation, and the output is an action to select a required variant (e.g., click[10 slots]) or proceed if criteria are satisfied.

60

Quality

69%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./experiments/src/skills/webshop/webshop-product-detail-inspector/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is well-structured and lean with a clear decision workflow, but it is undermined by a missing output-format specification and by bundle reference files that are present but never linked from the body, leaving navigation incomplete.

Suggestions

Complete the 'Output Format' section by showing the exact required response format (e.g., `click[<value>]` or `search[<keywords>]`), since the section currently ends with 'in this exact format:' and nothing follows.

Link the bundle files from the body — e.g., add a 'See [action_guidelines.md](references/action_guidelines.md) for valid action patterns and exact-match rules' note near the Core Logic, and reference trajectory_example.md as a worked example.

Make the validation checkpoints explicit (e.g., 'Verify the option string is an exact, case-sensitive match for a clickable element before emitting click[]') rather than leaving them implicit in the Examine step.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence — it does not explain what a webshop or product page is — with only minor redundancy in repeated '10 slots' examples that could be trimmed, fitting the 'efficient with minor over-explanation' anchor rather than the fully lean 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

The Core Logic gives concrete if/then branches with real action examples (click '10 slots', 'Back to Search', 'Buy Now'), but the 'Output Format' section promises 'Your response must be in this exact format:' and then provides nothing — a missing key detail that leaves the guidance incomplete, matching the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' anchor.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Steps are clearly sequenced (Parse → Examine → Decision & Action) with implicit validation checkpoints (price-vs-budget check, required-attribute check) and a fallback branch (Back to Search), but the checkpoints are implicit rather than explicit error-recovery loops, so it sits at 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is organized into clear sections (Purpose, Input, Core Logic, Output Format) but never signals or links the provided bundle files (references/action_guidelines.md, references/trajectory_example.md), and the crucial exact-action-syntax rules live only in an unreferenced file — matching 'some structure but references not clearly signaled'.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, well-scoped, and answers both what the skill does and when it is used, with concrete examples. It stops short of a top score because trigger guidance is procedural rather than phrased as natural user-facing triggers and coverage is narrowly focused.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete actions — 'verify specific attributes or select options like size, color, or quantity', 'checking for '10 slots' option, price, material', 'select a required variant (e.g., click[10 slots])' — but coverage is narrow to a single product-inspection task, leaving minor gaps that keep it below a 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Clearly answers 'what' (examines a product detail page to verify attributes/select options) and gives an explicit 'when' ('It is used after clicking on a product, to confirm that the item matches the user's needs'), but the trigger guidance is procedurally framed rather than a crisp 'Use when...' phrase with concrete triggers, so it is not a 5.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good keyword coverage with concrete natural terms ('product detail page', 'size, color, or quantity', '10 slots', 'price, material', 'select options'), though a few common variations a user might phrase are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped to a clear niche (webshop product-detail inspection/variant selection) with concrete triggers that distinguish it from generic navigation, though it has minor overlap risk with a closely related search-results navigation skill.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
zjunlp/SkillNet
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.