Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and reasonably lean with a clear workflow and validation notes, but its actionability and progressive disclosure are undermined by a referenced script (configure_product.py) that is absent from the bundle and an unlinked reference file. Tightening these would materially raise the score.
Suggestions
Either bundle the referenced configure_product.py under scripts/ or replace the 'Use it to generate the correct click actions' instruction with the explicit, self-contained selection logic so the skill is actionable without the missing script.
Link the existing reference explicitly (e.g., 'See [action_protocol.md](references/action_protocol.md)') and remove the duplicated Action Format content from the body to avoid redundancy.
Add a short validate-fix-retry checkpoint after configuration (e.g., re-read observation, confirm the selected option is reflected, retry if not) to strengthen workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and does not over-explain concepts Claude knows, but the 'Action Format' section duplicates content that also lives in references/action_protocol.md and could be tightened. It is not score 3 because of this redundancy; not score 1 because it avoids verbosity and concept padding. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete action formats and examples ('click[<exact_value>]', product ID 'B06Y96MXJV'), but defers the core deterministic logic to 'configure_product.py', a bundled script that does not exist in the skill. It is not score 3 because the key tool it tells Claude to use is missing and the guidance is therefore incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step Core Workflow is present with validation notes ('Do not click an option if it does not appear in the current list of clickables', 'Always read the full observation after each action'), but the per-step configuration detail is deferred to the absent script and there is no structured validate-fix-retry feedback loop. It is not score 3 because checkpoints are advisory rather than structured with error-recovery loops. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into clear sections (Purpose, When to Use, Core Workflow, Action Format, Key Logic, Important Notes), but the body references a bundled script 'configure_product.py' that is not present and never links the existing references/action_protocol.md. It is not score 3 because navigation to bundle materials is incomplete and a referenced path is dangling. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |