Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured skill body that gives executable action syntax, a clear validated workflow, and a concrete trajectory example without padding. The only soft spot is slightly abstract refinement guidance in the validation step.
Suggestions
Tighten the validation step with a concrete re-query rule (e.g., specific fallback term ordering or how many retries before abandoning) instead of 'refine if results are poor'.
Add one more short example covering a zero-result or price-constraint recovery to make the feedback loop fully concrete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (workflow, decision logic, constraints, example) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable syntax ('search[keywords]', 'search[long clip-in hair extension]') and a worked example, but refinement guidance like 'refine if results are poor' stays somewhat abstract. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (Interpret, Formulate, Execute, Validate) with an explicit validation step and feedback loops for zero-result and price-overrun cases; only minor checkpoint explicitness keeps it from a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple under-50-line skill with no external references needed; sections are well-organized and self-contained, satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |