Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and clearly sequenced with a good worked example, but its central executable step depends on a script that is neither present in the bundle nor given an invocation command, and the one real reference file is never linked. Fixing the script reference and wiring up action_format.md would raise both actionability and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Ship the actual `selector.py` in a scripts/ directory and give its invocation in step 2 (e.g., `python scripts/selector.py --max-price 50 --requirements "portable double horn easy to carry"`), or inline the selection logic if the script is not bundled.
Reference `references/action_format.md` from the body (e.g., in step 3) so the verbatim-value and case-sensitivity rules for `click[value]` are discoverable instead of orphaned.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in step 3: confirm the selected product_id appears in the observation's clickable actions before executing `click[product_id]`.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Not 5 because the three bullets describing the script's internal filtering/scoring logic and the example's Thought paragraph partially restate what step 2 already specifies, and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The action format "click[product_id]" and the fully worked example are concrete, but the central step — "Use the bundled `selector.py` script" — gives no path and no invocation command, and no such script exists in the bundle (no scripts/ directory). This is a major executability gap rather than a minor one, matching the 'incomplete / missing key details' anchor rather than 'mostly executable'. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence (assess list → apply selection heuristic → execute click) with the output action format pinned and a thought-process template. Not 5 because verification is only implicit ("for final verification and purchase") rather than an explicit checkpoint confirming the selected product_id is clickable. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized for a short skill, but reference integrity is broken: the body points to a nonexistent bundled script (`selector.py` is not in the bundle) while the existing `references/action_format.md` — which contains the critical verbatim/case-sensitivity rule for `click[value]` — is never referenced from the body, leaving a real reference buried. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |