Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concrete and actionable with exact action grammar and examples, but it underuses its reference file and does not sequence the full search-to-select workflow with explicit checkpoints.
Suggestions
Add a one-line pointer to `references/action_grammar.md` from the Action Protocol section so Claude reaches the detailed click/observation parsing instead of duplicating grammar inline.
Replace the redundant second example with one demonstrating the click/select path, or sequence an explicit search -> evaluate -> click workflow with a validation checkpoint against the user's constraints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the two examples are near-identical (both `search[...]` for a product under a price ceiling), so the second adds little and could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides exact action grammar (`search[<keywords>]`, `click[<product_id>]`) with concrete, filled examples that are effectively copy-paste ready for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Edge cases give some recovery guidance (0 results -> broaden; price exceeded -> adjust terms), but the search-to-click sequence is not laid out as an explicitly validated workflow and no example demonstrates the click path. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but the bundled `references/action_grammar.md` (detailed click-value and observation parsing) is never linked or signaled from the body, and part of the grammar is duplicated inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |