Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, actionable protocol with exact action formats, worked examples, and explicit edge-case recovery, so a Claude following it knows exactly what to emit. Its one structural weakness is that the accompanying action-grammar reference file is never referenced from the body, leaving useful detail (click value rules, observation parsing) undiscoverable.
Suggestions
Add a clearly signaled link to the existing bundle file, e.g. a '## Action grammar' section with 'See [action_grammar.md](references/action_grammar.md) for click-value rules and observation parsing', so the reference is discoverable.
Add a worked click example showing how to extract a product_id from search results and emit `click[<id>]`, since the protocol defines that action but never demonstrates it.
Trim the duplicated constraint by merging 'You must respond using **only** the following two action formats' and 'Your final response must be in the exact structure' into a single sentence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, and the worked examples demonstrate rather than describe. It falls short of a 5 only because 'You must respond using **only** the following two action formats. Your final response must be in the exact structure' states the same constraint twice in consecutive sentences. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives exact, executable action formats (`search[<keywords>]`, `click[<product_id>]`) plus two complete worked Thought/Action examples that are copy-paste-ready patterns. The minor gap keeping it from a 5 is that the `click` action is defined in the protocol but never exemplified — no example shows how to derive or format a product_id from results. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-purpose skill whose single action is unambiguous: respond with Thought plus `search[<keywords>]`. The Edge Cases section adds explicit error-recovery loops ('If the search returns 0 results, retry with a broader query', 'If all results exceed the user's price constraint, try adding price-related terms'), and no destructive or batch operations apply that would cap the score. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body itself is well-organized into short sections and under 50 lines, but the bundle ships references/action_grammar.md containing highly relevant detail (click-value casing rules, observation parsing, navigation actions) that the body never mentions or links. Per the rubric's bundle-structure guideline, this is a reference that is present but not clearly signaled from the overview. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |