Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured body for a simple skill with a clear workflow and worked example. It loses points for a truncated Action Format section and an orphaned reference file that is never linked from the body.
Suggestions
Complete the "## Action Format" section by showing the literal `search[keywords]` template it promises, e.g. `search[<2-3 core attributes, lowercase, space-separated>]`.
Link the existing reference from the body, e.g. add under Key Principles: "For the full attribute-priority hierarchy and pitfalls, see [search_strategy_guide.md](references/search_strategy_guide.md)."
Add one more worked example covering a different category (e.g., electronics) to make the formatting rule concrete across product types.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, assumes Claude's competence, and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; every principle earns its place, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | A concrete worked example (`search[size 5 patent-beige high heel]`) and explicit formatting rules give usable guidance, but the "## Action Format" section ends with "in the exact format:" and never delivers the promised format, leaving a key detail incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | For this simple single-purpose skill the Input→Process→Output sequence is clear and the single action is unambiguous; it is not a destructive/batch operation, so no validation checkpoint is required to cap the score. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized, but references/search_strategy_guide.md exists and is never linked or signaled from the body, so the reference is not discoverable — matching the references-present-but-not-clearly-signaled anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |