Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The decision logic is well structured and token-efficient, but the skill is critically incomplete: the "Action Format" section promises a strict format and then the file ends, so the exact response format is never specified. The sole bundle reference (trajectory.md) is neither linked by path nor complete, compounding the incompleteness.
Suggestions
Complete the "Action Format" section — the body ends with "Your response must strictly follow this format:" and no format follows; add the exact response template (e.g., the precise `click[value=...]` output string).
Replace the oblique mention "as shown in the trajectory" with an explicit path link to [trajectory.md](references/trajectory.md), and finish that file — it currently ends at an empty "Observation 1 (Search Results Page):" heading.
Add an explicit verification checkpoint after selection (e.g., re-check that the clicked variant still satisfies a stated price constraint before finalizing) rather than leaving verification implicit in a 'may need to' bullet.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence (e.g., "Identify the list of available variant options from the observation text") with no padding explaining known concepts. Minor redundancy: "Use this skill when you are on a product detail page and the observation contains a list of variant options" followed by "The skill is triggered by the presence of multiple clickable options" repeats the same trigger twice in one paragraph. Not 5 due to that duplication; not 3 since the rest is efficient. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Quotes: "execute a `click[value]` action", "Ensure the selected variant's price (if displayed) complies", "Prefer the standard, single-unit option" — concrete decision rules exist. However the "Action Format" section ends with "Your response must strictly follow this format:" and the file ends there; the required response format is never shown. Not 4: a key executable detail is missing entirely; not 2: the steps and action token are specific, not high-level hints. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 1-2-3 sequence (Parse → Assess → Select) with decision branches, and a verify-before-commit bullet ("You may need to click on a variant to see its updated price/details before finalizing the selection"). But the workflow's terminal step — the required output format — is severed by the truncated "Action Format" section, leaving the final checkpoint missing. Not 4: the gap is not minor; not 2: the sequence itself is well defined. This is a single low-risk click action, so the destructive/batch cap is not triggered. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections ("When to Use", "Core Decision Logic", "Action Format") are well organized and the body is short, but the only bundle file, references/trajectory.md, is referenced obliquely as "as shown in the trajectory" with no path or link, and the trajectory file itself is truncated (ends at an empty "Observation 1 (Search Results Page):" heading). The reference is present but not clearly signaled or navigable. Not 4: an unreferenced-by-path, incomplete file is more than a minor organization gap; not 2: the body's own structure is good. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |