Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured instruction body for a simple skill, undermined by an incomplete 'Action Format' section that omits the promised response format and lacks validation guidance.
Suggestions
Complete the 'Action Format' section by providing the exact response format promised after 'Your response must strictly follow this format:'.
Add a brief validation/verify step (e.g., confirm the clicked variant's displayed price/details match the user constraint) before finalizing the selection.
Link the trajectory reference explicitly, e.g. 'as shown in the [trajectory](references/trajectory.md)', so the bundled reference is clearly signaled.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place, with only minor tightening possible. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Decision logic and the click[value] action are concrete, but the 'Action Format' section is truncated ('Your response must strictly follow this format:' with no format shown), leaving executable guidance incomplete. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (Parse, Assess, Select and Act), but there are no validation checkpoints and the truncated Action Format section leaves the final action ambiguous. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Short, well-organized body for a simple single-purpose skill; the trajectory reference is signaled informally but not linked via a markdown path to references/trajectory.md. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |