Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with an explicit, validated workflow and copy-paste commands, and it mostly avoids explaining things Claude already knows. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: it is a monolithic single-file skill with no organized reference bundle, and its one shared-refs pointer is not clearly signaled.
Suggestions
Pull the long '技术要点' and '常见错误' tables into a references/ file (e.g. references/technical-notes.md) and link to it from a short overview section, so SKILL.md stays a lean entry point.
Replace the bare relative path '../.cat-cafe-shared-refs/evidence-output-contract.md' with a clearly labeled, one-level-deep reference (e.g. 'Evidence output contract: See [evidence-output-contract.md](../.cat-cafe-shared-refs/evidence-output-contract.md)') so the pointer is discoverable.
Trim the repeated '猫猫/operator' framing and consolidate the durable≠immortal / running≠durable caveats into one place to reduce token cost without losing the safety guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and mostly earns its tokens — tables, exact commands, and delivery-status contracts rather than concept explanation — though the repeated '猫猫/operator' framing and some restated caveats (e.g. durable≠immortal appears in multiple forms) could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready commands (`pnpm preview:process start/status --port PORT --cwd ... -- COMMAND`, `curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" http://localhost:PORT`) and a concrete MCP call (`cat_cafe_preview_open({port, path, worktreeId, threadId})`) cover the common cases with exact flags and expected output codes. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 3-step open flow is explicitly sequenced (verify server → call MCP → read deliveryStatus) with validation checkpoints (status=running/origin=launchd, HTTP 200/301/304), error-recovery guidance in the common-errors table, and a feedback loop that ties each deliveryStatus value to a distinct reporting action. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist in references/scripts/assets, and the single external pointer (../.cat-cafe-shared-refs/evidence-output-contract.md) is a buried relative path rather than a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference; most detail is inlined into one long SKILL.md rather than split across files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |