Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An operationally rich body with excellent workflow gating and error-recovery tables, weakened by noticeable redundancy (the launcher command and grammar rules repeated across sections) and a monolithic single-file structure with no progressive disclosure despite its length.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the managed-launcher start command and consolidate the bounded-vs-ordinary `--dir`/`--cwd` grammar rules into one section; the current body restates them in four places (基础流程, Step 1, 常见错误, 什么时候主动用), which could be cut by roughly a third.
Move the 技术要点 table (Preview Gateway, iframe sandbox, delivery contract details) and the launcher grammar contract into a reference file (e.g. references/preview-architecture.md) and keep a one-line signaled pointer in SKILL.md, enabling progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is almost entirely non-obvious operational contract detail rather than padded explanation, but the managed-launcher start command is duplicated in two full blocks and the bounded-vs-ordinary `--dir`/`--cwd` grammar rule is restated in four different sections. Anchor 3 (could be tightened); not 4 because the repetition goes beyond minor trimming. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, near-copy-paste commands ("pnpm --dir /absolute/cat-cafe-feature-worktree preview:process start --port PORT ... pnpm dev:direct", "curl -s -o /dev/null -w %{http_code} http://localhost:PORT") with full output interpretation and a deliveryStatus decision table. Not 5: Step 2's MCP call embeds prose placeholders ("当前 worktreeId（有就传）") and the `blocked` branch just says "看 deliveryReason" without enumerating reasons or fixes. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-3 are strictly sequenced with hard validation gates ("只有 status=running 才进入下步", "200/301/304 = 可以继续", "000 = 服务器没起来，先启动再说"), a deliveryStatus feedback loop before claiming success, and a phenomenon→cause→fix error-recovery table. Matches the anchor-5 pattern of validate-then-proceed with error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good section structure, but there are no reference files at all: the ~145-line body inlines the tech-details table and launcher grammar contracts that belong in separate reference material, and the single external pointer ("../.cat-cafe-shared-refs/evidence-output-contract.md") is buried in a bullet rather than clearly signaled. Not 2 because the sections are well-organized; not 4 because content that should be split out is entirely inline. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |