Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, well-organized instruction skill with concrete tool references, a clear step sequence, and recovery/verification sections. It could push higher by adding exact call syntax and an explicit validate-then-proceed checkpoint.
Suggestions
Include the exact tool call signatures (arguments and expected return fields) so the guidance is copy-paste executable rather than descriptive.
Make the verification step an explicit gate before sending a reply (e.g. 'only call reply after confirming the refs match the current invocation') to strengthen the feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and direct, assumes competence, and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; a few framing sentences ('这里的身份、来源与权限由 Host 绑定') could be tightened slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Names the exact tools and the refs to pass (contextRef, returnRef, replyOperationRef) with concrete per-step guidance, but stops short of executable call syntax/parameters, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence (1–4) plus a dedicated recovery section and a 验证 section provide most checkpoints and a feedback loop, but the validation is framed as honest state-reporting rather than an explicit validate-before-proceed gate. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short (~30-line) single-purpose skill with no bundle files and well-organized sections (workflow, recovery, verification); per the simple-skill note this is appropriately structured and navigable. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |