Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete selectors, templates, and path conventions, but is verbose for its token budget and ships references to files that are not present in the bundle. Workflow sequencing is solid though some validation checkpoints are implicit.
Suggestions
Consolidate the duplicate 常见错误 tables and move time-stamped verification notes (2026-03-10 实测) into a single 'deprecated/old' section to recover conciseness.
Add the missing bundle files (refs/chatgpt-browser-automation.md, refs/claude-ai-browser-automation.md, refs/gemini-browser-automation.md, cat-cafe-skills/refs/research-prompt-template.md) or remove the references so progressive disclosure is backed by real files.
Add explicit failure-recovery checkpoints to the browser-automation wait/poll steps (e.g., what to do if the stop button never disappears) to lift workflow clarity above 2.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly actionable project-specific procedure rather than generic concept explanation, but the ~315-line bilingual body carries redundancy (two 常见错误 sections, repeated Quota/verification notes) and time-stamped checks ('2026-03-10 实测验证') that bloat tokens without being in a deprecated section. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete DOM selectors, JS file-injection snippets, exact path conventions, and a fill-in Part 1 prompt template make the browser-automation and consultation workflows copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Step 1–5 (Mode A) and Step 1–3 (Mode B) are clearly sequenced with validation (Step 4 codebase check, Step 5 commit-SHA verification), but browser-automation waiting/polling steps lack failure-recovery checkpoints and some validation is only implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are clearly signaled and one level deep ('详见 refs/chatgpt-browser-automation.md'), but the referenced files (refs/*.md, cat-cafe-skills/refs/research-prompt-template.md) do not exist in any bundle directory, so the split is not actually backed by bundle structure and inline detail that could live in refs remains in SKILL.md. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |