Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable orchestration playbook with a clear sequenced workflow and explicit validation checkpoints. Its main weaknesses are redundancy between the Common Mistakes table and inline rules, and a monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure to supporting files.
Suggestions
Remove duplication between the 'Common Mistakes' table and the inline 禁止 rules in sections 2-3 (Evidence/Reasoning separation, Light-default, 不抹平分歧 are restated verbatim); keep one canonical statement and cross-reference it.
Merge '什么时候叠加其他 skill？' and '下一步' into a single skill-chaining table — both list deep-research/feat-lifecycle/collaborative-thinking paths and overlap.
Split the detailed 9-section 报告结构 and 应急降级/收敛沉淀检查 reference material into a referenced file (e.g. REPORT_STRUCTURE.md) so SKILL.md stays an overview, adding one-level-deep navigation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and directive and assumes Claude's competence, but the 'Common Mistakes' table restates inline 禁止 items verbatim (Evidence/Reasoning separation, Light-default, 不抹平分歧) and '下一步' overlaps '什么时候叠加其他 skill?', so it could be tightened. Not score 3 because of this redundancy. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance: dispatch payload allow/forbid lists, an exact WHY 链四格 field template, a role table, a 9-section report structure, and a degradation table — fully actionable for an instruction-only skill with no need for code. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence (Dispatch → Independent → Synthesis → Contributor Check → Delivery) with an explicit validation checkpoint (Contributor Check, '这步不能跳过') and feedback loops (收敛沉淀检查 有/没有, 凭证过期 handling), matching the anchor with explicit validation and error-recovery loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and all content sits in one ~186-line monolithic file with no one-level-deep references; sections are well organized but detailed reference material (9-section 报告结构, 应急降级) is inline that could be split. Not score 3 because the 'one-level-deep references' anchor is not met. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |