Conciseness

Mostly efficient (dense tables, YAML/TSX templates, no explaining of concepts Claude already knows), but the "confirm/auto-confirm 事件不证明业务成功" point is repeated at least five times — in the advance-mode table, the Step 2 prose paragraph, 编排规则, Step 6 items 4–5, and Common Mistakes — and could be consolidated. Anchor 4 ('efficient, minor trim') is exceeded by this level of repetition, but it is not the padded over-explanation of anchor 2.

Actionability

Mostly executable: copy-paste-ready scene card, Flow YAML template, tag-manifest and registry examples, plus a concrete target whitelist regex (`/^[a-zA-Z0-9._-]+$/`). Minor gap: Step 5's CI gate lists checks but gives no command to run the validation, so it is not fully copy-paste ready — one notch below anchor 5.

Workflow Clarity

A clear six-step sequence with explicit decision criteria (complexity thresholds), a Step 5 checklist, and Step 6 E2E covering exit/skip, reject/fail, refresh-resume, and missing-target recovery. Minor validation gaps: no actual CI command and no explicit fix-and-re-validate loop, so it sits between anchors 4 and 5 — closer to 4.

Progressive Disclosure

Good structure: well-sectioned single file (When to Use, 核心知识, Steps 1–6, Quick Reference, Common Mistakes), appropriate for an SOP of this size with no bundle files. The single external reference ([交互叙事方法](../.cat-cafe-shared-refs/interaction-narrative.md)) is clearly signaled but its path does not resolve from the skill bundle — a minor organization gap that keeps it below anchor 5.

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — "场景识别 → YAML 编排 → 标签标注 → 注册发现 → 测试验证" — plus explicit outputs ("Flow YAML + tag-manifest 更新 + registry 注册 + CI 校验通过"), giving comprehensive coverage of the skill's capabilities.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ("标准引导流程设计 SOP" with named stages and outputs) and when ("Use when: 新建引导流程、添加场景引导…") with concrete trigger phrases, plus an explicit "Not for" boundary. Anchor 4 would require the 'when' to be less explicit, which it is not.

Trigger Term Quality

The "Use when" clause covers natural phrases users would say ("新建引导流程、添加场景引导、维护 Guide Catalog、编写引导 YAML") with good synonym coverage, but misses a few common variations such as onboarding-style phrasing or "引导配置". Not below 3 — the terms are specific and natural, not generic.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The explicit "Not for" clause redirects overlapping cases to named sibling skills (`concept-demo-design`, `tdd`, `pencil-design`), giving a clear niche with minimal conflict risk.