Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete templates, commands, and a clearly sequenced escalation workflow, but it is monolithic with some duplicated option definitions and philosophy padding that limit conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the [1]/[2]/[3] option definitions: define them once and have the Card and Check-in 协议 sections reference that single source.
Move the L1/L2/L3 dialogue tables and the rich-block JSON templates into a references/ file (e.g. DIALOGUE.md) and link to it from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
Trim the '核心原则' philosophy section to one line or fold it into the intro to reduce token overhead.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with tables and templates, but the '核心原则' philosophy section and the duplicated 1/2/3 option definitions (in both the Card JSON and the Check-in 协议 block) add tokens that could be tightened, so it is not fully lean. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete rich-block JSON templates with explicit fields, exact slash commands (/hyperfocus-brake reset|status), env vars, a bypass cooldown table, and a regex sanitization allowlist — copy-paste ready and specific. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The ASCII 触发流程 diagram gives a clear sequence, the L1→L2→L3 escalation and bypass cooldown递增 act as feedback loops, and explicit safety guards (第3次禁用, 消毒 allowlist) provide checkpoints; no destructive/batch cap applies. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned but is a ~155-line monolithic file with no bundle files; content that could live one level deep (the L1/L2/L3 dialogue tables, rich-block templates) is inline rather than split into references. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |