Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced behavioral skill: exact phrasing examples, explicit permission checkpoints, and a clear four-phase workflow with timing guidance. The main cost is redundancy — the two mistake tables and the flow diagram overlap heavily, inflating token cost without adding guidance.
Suggestions
Merge the "绝对不做" and "Common Mistakes" tables into a single mistakes table (wrong approach → correct approach → why), since they cover the same failure modes (early root-cause analysis, unrequested action plans, jokes without permission, apologizing then disappearing).
Trim the response-flow ASCII diagram to a compact phase list (one line per phase with its gate), leaving the detailed sub-steps to the per-phase sections it currently duplicates.
Move the root-cause analysis template and the multi-cat role-division table into a reference file (e.g. references/root-cause-template.md), keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview with a clearly signaled link.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section is skill-specific with no generic concept explanations, but the "绝对不做" and "Common Mistakes" tables substantially duplicate each other, and the response-flow diagram restates the per-phase detail that follows, so the body could be meaningfully tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The body gives copy-paste-ready guidance for an instruction-only skill: exact scripts ("你现在还好吗？", "这是我的错，对不起。"), ✅/❌ phrasing pairs, a humor-permission detection rule, a fill-in root-cause markdown template, and a concrete voice-message JSON example. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-phase sequence (情绪急救 → 止损 → 补偿性劳动 → 教训沉淀) has explicit gates ("情绪稳定后", "等待回应"), permission checkpoints (情绪许可检测), a first-5-minutes checklist, and timing guidance for follow-up — no destructive or batch operations requiring validation loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single file is well-sectioned with clear headers, tables, and a quick reference, and its external references (../.cat-cafe-shared-refs/shared-rules.md, public-lessons.md) are clearly signaled and one level deep. At ~230 lines, though, the detailed per-phase guidance and the root-cause template could live in reference files to slim the overview. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |