Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, highly actionable body that gives parameterized tool calls, per-question-type recipes, and explicit stop criteria with feedback loops. Its main weaknesses are redundancy between the recipe and stop-criteria tables and a monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure into reference files.
Suggestions
Merge or cross-reference the '8 类题型 → recipe' and '何时停下来判据' tables — they cover overlapping ground and could be a single table with recipe + stop-condition columns, saving meaningful tokens.
Move the 'AUDHD coverage 案例 5 步 recipe' and/or 'Common Mistakes' into a references/ file (e.g. WORKED_EXAMPLE.md) and link to it from the body, enabling progressive disclosure and a leaner SKILL.md.
Drop the '和其他 Skill 的区别' table or trim it to one line, since the frontmatter GOTCHA and the '链入下一步' section already convey the same memory-navigation distinction.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and dense with task-specific knowledge Claude lacks, but the '何时停下来判据' table largely re-states the '8 类题型 → recipe' table, and the '和其他 Skill 的区别' section repeats the frontmatter GOTCHA. Not a 3 because of this verifiable redundancy; not a 1 because no padding with concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, parameterized calls throughout — 'search_evidence("audhd adhd asd", hybrid, scope=docs, limit=10)', 'graph_resolve(anchor, depth=1, relations=[feature_ref,related_to])', 'list_recent(scope=threads, since=N天)' — plus a fully spelled-out 5-step recipe. Copy-paste-ready executable guidance, matching the 3-anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step recipes are explicitly sequenced with validation/feedback checkpoints: '≥3 路命中无新 anchor 才停', '高置信命中 → 必 Read 原文', and magic-word force-stops ('我能猜出来' → 停). Clear sequence with explicit validation and error-recovery loops, matching the 3-anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized with clear headers, but the file is a single monolithic SKILL.md with no bundle files and no one-level-deep references offloading detail; the AUDHD 5-step case study and Common Mistakes table are inline material that could be split. Not a 3 because progressive disclosure into references is absent; not a 1 because organization is genuinely clear. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |