Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable instruction skill with concrete tool calls, copy-paste output templates, and a clear sequenced workflow with sensible guardrails. The only gaps are an explicit output-validation/retry loop and marginal room to split content into a reference file.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/retry checkpoint for the output JSON (e.g., verify every suggested labelId exists in the fetched label list before emitting the SUGGESTIONS_JSON block) to lift workflow_clarity toward 5.
Since the body is slightly over 50 lines, consider moving the extended '无标签时' template and label-system guidance into a references/ file and linking to it, which would justify a 5 on progressive_disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: a short flow, two copy-paste output templates, and a tight notes section, with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every section earns its place, matching the 5 anchor; it is above a 4 because there are no padded or over-explained passages to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete tool names (cat_cafe_list_labels, cat_cafe_list_threads) and exact copy-paste-ready markdown table + JSON templates covering both the labeled and unlabeled cases. Fully actionable instruction guidance matching the 5 anchor; absence of code is not penalized for an instruction skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence (获取数据 → 分析 → 输出建议) with quality checkpoints (skip uncertain threads, don't force-classify, max 50) and a human-in-the-loop confirmation ("等用户在 modal 中确认"). It is a 4 rather than 5 because there is no explicit output-validation/retry loop, and the batch cap is avoided since validation is present rather than missing. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into 流程, 输出格式, and 注意事项 sections with no nested references and no bundle files; self-contained and easy to navigate. It is a 4 rather than 5 because the body is ~70 lines (above the under-50 simple-skill threshold that would allow a 5 on structure alone) with no one-level-deep reference split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |