Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is actionable and workflow-clear with strong validation structure, but it is over-long for a behavioral reflex and relies on referenced refs/ files that are absent, breaking progressive disclosure. Tightening redundancy and shipping the missing bundle files would raise the score.
Suggestions
Create the referenced bundle files (refs/resolver-catalog.md, refs/claim-schema.md, refs/dogfood-fixtures.md) or move their promised detail inline so navigation is functional.
Dedupe the repeated trigger/action rules across the trigger table, self-activation table, and self-check checklist to reduce length and redundancy.
Collapse the eight demo cases into a compact table or move them entirely to refs/dogfood-fixtures.md, keeping only one representative example inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and operational rather than padded with concept explanations, but at ~310 lines it restates the same rules across the trigger table, self-activation table, checklist, and demo section, so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete TypeScript WaitSourceRef schema, named resolvers/commands (gh api, git log --grep --author, feat_index.lookup), a push-back template, and a verdict×actionFamily action table; some resolvers remain abstract domain tools rather than copy-paste commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Q1→Q2→Q3 is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (verdict states, fail-closed, push-back feedback, a self-check checklist); the branching action-policy complexity keeps it just short of the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and references are clearly signaled with descriptions, but the referenced bundle files (refs/resolver-catalog.md, refs/claim-schema.md, refs/dogfood-fixtures.md) do not exist, so navigation is non-functional and detail is promised but missing. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |