Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable body with concrete per-kind examples and a useful error/pitfall table, weakened by implicit workflow checkpoints and a referenced file (refs/rich-blocks.md) absent from the bundle.
Suggestions
Trim persona flavor text (e.g. "猫猫朋友看不懂上下文", "我是文字猫") and the unexplained "operator拍板" line to tighten conciseness.
Add a single numbered send sequence with an explicit checkpoint, e.g. 1) call get_rich_block_rules on first use, 2) write 1-2 sentence summary, 3) send block, 4) confirm block rendered.
Either include refs/rich-blocks.md in the bundle or remove the reference and rely solely on get_rich_block_rules so signaled references resolve to real files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and explicitly delegates field specs to get_rich_block_rules / refs, but cat-persona asides ("猫猫朋友看不懂上下文", "我是文字猫") and the opaque "operator拍板" line add tokens that don't aid the task. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Copy-paste JSON examples for all eight block kinds plus exact tool (cat_cafe_create_rich_block) and field names, including the "字段是 kind 不是 type" pitfall — fully executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps exist across sections (首次使用 → 先调规则; 先文字后块; 发送方式) and the podcast-timeout row is an explicit feedback loop, but the core send flow lacks a single numbered sequence with explicit checkpoints. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Overview is well-organized (kind table, minimal examples) and detail is delegated one level deep to get_rich_block_rules and refs/rich-blocks.md, but the referenced refs/rich-blocks.md is not present in the bundle. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |