Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable decision guide: complete minimal examples for all eight block kinds, exact tool names and parameters, boundary tables, and real validation checkpoints. The main costs are token-level redundancy in the publishing rules, a workflow that must be assembled from several sections rather than one ordered sequence, and reliance on an out-of-bundle reference file for full field specs.
Suggestions
Consolidate the workspace raw-URL pattern and video-file rule so each appears once (e.g. only in '发送方式'), letting the 常见错误 table reference it in one line instead of restating the full URL pattern.
Add one short ordered checklist at the top of '发送方式' (decide surface → first-use get_rich_block_rules → write 1-2 sentence summary → publish via the right call → verify messageId) so the multi-path publishing flow reads as a single sequence with validation at each branch.
Bring the detailed field spec (or at least a pointer copy) inside the skill bundle under references/ so the '../.cat-cafe-shared-refs/rich-blocks.md' dependency does not break when the skill is used outside its home workspace.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with non-obvious domain rules Claude cannot infer (publish_image key/conflict semantics, 'DOMPurify 静默剥掉所有 on* 属性', the native-guard restriction on runtime '/uploads') rather than padded explanation, fitting the 4-anchor. It is not a 5 because the workspace raw-URL pattern and the video-file rule each appear twice ('发送方式' and again in '常见错误'), and long multi-clause paragraphs like the publish_image conflict rules could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every one of the eight kinds has a minimal, copy-paste-ready JSON example ('{"id": "a1", "kind": "audio", ...}'), tool calls are named exactly ('cat_cafe_create_rich_block', 'get_rich_block_rules', 'cat_cafe_publish_image' with a concrete parameter example), and the 常见错误 table gives error→consequence→correct-action triples. This fully matches the 5-anchor's executable, case-covering guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequencing rules and checkpoints are present — '先写 1-2 句自然语言摘要，再发 block', '先判交付面，再判 block', first-use 'get_rich_block_rules', and explicit validations ('发之前 curl 一遍确认 200', '先确认该定位确实可读', the warning that '只收到"富块已创建"仍可能是 invocation buffer') plus a feedback loop for the podcast timeout. It stops short of 5 because the workflow is distributed across sections and tables rather than presented as one explicit ordered sequence with per-step validation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good: an overview table of the eight kinds, minimal inline examples, and full field specs deferred one level deep to 'get_rich_block_rules' and '../.cat-cafe-shared-refs/rich-blocks.md', clearly signaled at both point of use and in the 参考 section — matching the 4-anchor. It is not a 5 because the only detailed reference lives outside the skill bundle and does not exist in this workspace (no references/ directory, no .cat-cafe-shared-refs/rich-blocks.md found), so navigation relies on an external path that cannot be verified here. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |