Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is actionable and well-sequenced, with concrete tools, copy-paste trigger JSON, and explicit confirmation checkpoints for registration and destructive deletion. The only weakness is mild redundancy in a couple of repeated notes that slightly trim token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, table-driven content with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but a few small redundancies (the 'MCP 自动注入当前猫 ID' note repeated across templates and the routing note duplicating the frontmatter) keep it just below the 'every token earns its place' anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete MCP tool names and copy-paste-ready trigger JSON examples covering the common recurring and one-shot cases match the 'fully executable; copy-paste ready; specific examples cover common cases' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 4-step registration flow with an explicit preview→confirm→register checkpoint and a 3-step deletion flow with target confirmation, matching the 'explicit validation steps; feedback loops' anchor for these destructive/manage operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the body is a well-organized, sectioned overview with navigable tables; per the scoring notes a skill with no need for external references can score 5 with well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |